DVD+RW alliance releases 2.4x DVD+RW Double Layer specs.

Just when
one thought that double/dual layer write-once media was the last addition to the
list of DVD recordable formats, the DVD+RW Alliance has just announced the
release of version 1.0 specifications for 2.4x speed writing to Double Layer
DVD+RW by various media manufacturers.  This comes just about a month after
Philips Licensing
released the version 1.0 specifications for DVD+RW DL media.

Like write-once Double Layer DVD+RW media, DVD+RW
DL media features a native capacity of 8.5GB and will use phase-change materials
as with current DVD+RW media.  Unfortunately, due to its very low
reflectivity of 5% to 10%, this media can only be written to and read from using
new DVD writers and ROM drives designed to handle this media and cannot be read
in existing DVD-ROM or rewriter drives.  This new DVD+RW DL specification
covers both 8cm and 12cm media.

The DVD+RW Alliance, a voluntary association of industry-leading personal computer, optical storage and consumer electronics manufacturers that support the Plus format for DVD recording, has announced the release of version 1.0 specifications for 2.4X rewriting on Double Layer DVD+RW media by HP, Mitsubishi Kagaku Media/Verbatim, Royal Philips Electronics, Ricoh, Sony Corporation, Thomson Inc. and Yamaha.

DVD+RW media and writers are designed to rewrite up to a full 8.5 GB DVD+RW. The new 2.4X DVD+RW Double Layer discs will be based on new phase-change materials, which enable writing on both the semi-transparent layer 0 and the more reflective layer 1.

With PC Blu-ray and HD DVD writers coming out shortly,
it will be interesting to see how this media pricing compares with rewritable
Blu-ray and HD DVD media, considering how expensive Double Layer DVD+R media
cost when it first hit the market.  On the other hand, unlike DVD+/-R DL
media, as DVD+RW DL media will not be compatible with existing drives, chances
are that sales will be very slim, considering how poor DVD+/-R DL media is
selling at present due to its poor compatibility and high
pricing.

Source: TMC.net

No posts to display